Client Advisor applicants have rated the interview process at Marsh Risk with 3.6 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 80% positive. To compare, the company-average is 76.3% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Client Advisor roles take an average of 111 days to get hired, when considering 5 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Marsh Risk overall takes an average of 37 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Marsh Risk as a Client Advisor according to 5 Glassdoor interviews include:
Phone interview: 24%
Background check: 18%
Group panel interview: 18%
Skills test: 12%
One on one interview: 12%
Drug test: 6%
Personality test: 6%
Other: 6%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied online. The process took 3 weeks. I interviewed at Marsh Risk (Norwich, England) in Sep 2019
Interview
Interview with 2 members of staff in Norwich offices where I was asked a serious of questions relating to my skills and experience. I was invited to the Marsh office in Norwich where I had my interview on the Friday and was offered a position by the Monday.
I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at Marsh Risk (Dublin, Dublin) in Jan 2023
Interview
Microsoft Teams interview with direct manager and her direct manager. Started with introductions and what the role involves. I gave a background of my personal life and career to date and answered some questions about how I can fit in to the role especially coming from an underwriting background.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
How would I transition from being an Underwriter to a Client Advisor
I applied online. The process took 3 weeks. I interviewed at Marsh Risk (Norwich, England) in Feb 2020
Interview
After submitting an online application I was promptly contacted to arrange a phone call. It lasted half an hour and aimed at getting to know my character, educational background and current employment activities. A face to face meeting was suggested at the end of the call and was quickly arranged. I approached the interview confidently after receiving a ‘good luck’ email from the Talent Acquisition Team a few hours before its start. I was cheerfully greeted at the reception desk and met by my two interviewers who were welcoming. The questions were well-structured, and the interviewers actively engaged with my answers. Overall the journey was efficient, coordinated and friendly.